Because, Child

“Mom,” asks one of my brood, dozing on the living room couch at 4:00 a.m., “Why are you cleaning the kitchen in the middle of the night?”

Because, Child, that is what moms sometimes do when confronted with undeniable evidence that we do not have the power to make the world into the kind of place we wish it were.

Because, Child, when I went to bed last night, overwhelmed by low blood sugar and high inflammation, I had a vague hope you all might follow through on your chores without my supervision.

Because, Child, I woke up at 3:30 in the morning to find a message waiting for me that a friend I’ve known for 30 years now had gotten news the cancer was back.

I said I was so sorry and I would pray.

Prayer is hard right now.

I don’t know what to do with the God I grew up being taught to worship. I don’t think I can believe any longer that particular version of God really exists. I’m not quite sure what’s left for me here, though.

Once upon a million times, I remember reading that if God didn’t exist, we’d have to invent him. Google tells me that’s a paraphrase of the 18th Century philosopher Voltaire.

Those words make sense to me this morning, a morning when very little else makes sense.

Because, Child, I don’t want to live in a world where God doesn’t exist. I don’t want to believe I am completely helpless in the face of cancer and abuse and heartache. Even if, truly, sending thoughts and prayers and love across the miles is all I can do, I really want to believe there is some benefit to that.

For a while now, I have been pondering the idea that what we call “relationship” is perhaps my best framework for understanding who or what God is. I do not attempt to set this out here as some sort of settled doctrine, but it’s a thought I’ve had that persists and makes me wonder more about what it might mean.

As a kid, I remember learning that God is the Light of the world (John 8:12). I wondered what it would mean if that were to be taken literally. “What if,” I asked myself, “every light we see—every campfire, every twinkling star, every bulb or candle or florescent tube—is actually physical evidence of God all around us?” I still think about that sometimes. How would it impact my life if, every time the sun rose or the moon glowed or I flipped the switch on the wall, I realized: God is with me?

Most of the time, I dismiss such thoughts as fanciful. Yet, lately I’ve been stumbling over the idea of panentheism. Not to be confused with “pantheism” (God is all things), “panentheism” means God is in all things. Wherever we are, God is right there. Whether it’s the light or the trees or the child on the couch or the terrifying diagnosis, God is there. Whatever is going on around me, God is here.

What if all the love is God’s love? Does that mean we’ve made God up? I know some of my friends would say so, that what we like to think of as “God” is merely some human manifestation of unconscious energy. And maybe that’s true. Or maybe it’s the other way around, that we humans are a manifestation of God’s energy. Or maybe, maybe it’s some of both.

Maybe God isn’t merely a high and mighty Creator above all things, but is influenced in some way by our being. Maybe, just like any good relationship, God is as affected by me as I am by God.

And that may shed light on the few words of prayer I have to offer at the moment.

Please, God. Please. I am not enough to change all the things. I am not even enough to be actively showing love to everyone I know who is in need. But you, whatever, whoever you are, you are a power that is greater than I. Please be here in my need. And be there, in the places, in the moments I cannot possibly reach.

Is God energy? Spirit? Personal? Transcendent? I think so. I don’t really know. In fact, I don’t think I can really know.

Because, Child, if I could explain to you the mysteries of God, I don’t believe that would leave a God much worth my while.

Because I Thought I Had To

The words of the Bible, I once believed, could be extrapolated to create an exhaustive list covering all that was pleasing to God. Anything that wasn’t on that list must therefore not be pleasing to God, and was thus sinful. Christians, I understood, were supposed to do everything they could not to sin. Although we could never, ever, not possibly succeed in this endeavor, we were still supposed to try hard and beg God’s forgiveness each time we failed (usually several times a day).

Even the concept of choosing something that might not be supported by chapter and verse was slightly terrifying to me. Intentionally choosing to do something I believed was wrong (even if it wasn’t specifically covered in the text) was a sure path to condemnation and an eternity in a rocky, fiery place far from the love of God.

Wanting to be a good Christian child, I didn’t merely consider this view as accounting for my spiritual choices, but all the everyday, along-the-way choices for my physical, mental, emotional self as well.

I got to thinking about this topic today after seeing a post on Facebook advocating a mother’s enjoyment of sharing a bed with her kids in those fleeting years of childhood. Reading the paragraph that accompanied the drawing of a smiling woman with a toddler snuggled in for a kiss to one side and an infant on the other (well down from the pillows and not covered by a blanket), I found myself growing frustrated and anxious. That seemed a bit of an odd reaction, so I decided to dive into it.

One of those “godly” expectations I had of myself as I became a mom was to practice a particular style of parenting that involved keeping my young children physically close to me at all hours of the day. I wore my babies frequently, we co-slept throughout infancy, I thought my role as their mother was to be 100% available all the time. Of course, as a good Christian wife, it was my duty to be 100% available to my husband as well. If you are counting, you’ll have noticed I’m already at 200% of me and we haven’t even covered the housekeeping, homeschooling, church activities, individual Bible study, or any of the other things I honestly believed I was meant to be devoting my whole self to, every day of the week.

Rereading that last paragraph, it sounds positively ridiculous. Why would anyone have such a crazy notion of what must be expected of them? How could I not have immediately seen there was no possible way I could do all of that? Ah, but remember, I had already internalized from a very impressionable age that I was meant to be trying my best to live a life pleasing to God, all the while knowing I could never actually succeed in doing so.

Photo by T S from FreeImages

Truly, I expected the mental, physical, and emotional exhaustion of burnout was somehow the abundant life God intended me to lead. I was just missing the mark because I wasn’t quite doing it well enough. Maybe if I’d tried just a little bit harder . . . . Burnout, I have learned, leads quickly to resentment when I have no real sense that the choice was freely mine to make in the first place.

For most of my 45 years, I never mentioned this to anyone. I was too ashamed to admit I didn’t have it as together as I hoped people might imagine. I desperately wanted to be loved, and I thought the path to love was being “good.” I mean, that’s how I was meant to get God to love me, right? By obeying in all the things, because the Bible tells me so? And surely imperfect people wouldn’t, couldn’t love better or differently than God. How preposterous!

I’ve been thinking and talking a lot lately, primarily offline, about toxic theology. By that term, I mostly don’t mean specific tenets of particular faiths, but the essential misunderstandings the faithful allow to expand unchecked, in the face of official recognition that such beliefs are untrue and even dangerous.

So as not to pick on a particular sacred tradition, let me give an example from outside the realm of religion. A popular media personality from a well-known cable news and opinion channel was sued last year for some of the comments he’d made on air. The defense brought forward by his legal team (and accepted by the judge) was that he couldn’t be blamed for viewers taking his clear “exaggeration” and “non-literal commentary” to be actual fact (see: You Literally Can’t Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox’s Lawyers). The problem with this defense is that, clearly, many people watch his show and do, in fact, believe the assertions he makes to be truth, even though, apparently, no one was ever meant to.

Toxic theology works much the same way. Preachers and teachers and authors and interpreters of sacred texts put forth their words in ways that are too often miscommunicated, either because they are not clear in the speaking or we as listeners mistake their intentions. Yet when we all continue to use the same words without clarification, we believe we understand one another. The toxic part comes in when traditions focus on authority and respect and acceptance without question. In the faith of my childhood, to question someone in authority was tantamount to doubting God. And doubt, in this conception, was the antithesis of faith.

The underlying assumption seems to be that the expectations of God as Father are clear and understandable, so anyone not following these rules must be doing so because they want to disobey. This is bad parenting and bad theology.

Over the past decade and a half I’ve been a mother, I have come to the conclusion we are all just making it up as we go along. None of us knows exactly how to be a great parent and we’re simply doing our best, hoping we aren’t messing our kids up too badly. I am coming to understand faith works the same way.

Now, I am not of the opinion there is no objective truth. I very much think there is Truth (with the capital “t”) and there is a God who exists and who comes near to us, even as the story of Jesus so tangibly relates. I also don’t think anyone has it all right. None of us has cornered the market on Truth. We are all just doing the our best, hoping we don’t mess it up too badly.

I might be wrong.

It could be that the rigid religious constrains with which I was raised really are the true path to righteousness, and I’ve veered off sideways. I have friends and family members who have told me they believe this is so. The only response I can offer is that, for the years I spent trying to follow all the rules, I was exhausted and lived in great fear of losing God’s love. Now, I can honestly believe God loves me, and nothing I do (or fail to do) will ever change that. And getting things wrong? That’s not the end of the world as we know it. Rather, it’s another chance to learn something new, to uncover a previously unrealized facet of God’s immeasurable grace.

And that is the most liberating theology I have ever experienced.

Out of the Dark

(Content Warning: This post contains mentions of emotional abuse, physical abuse portrayed in the media, grooming behaviors, and self-blame.)

Why do we tell our stories? Who deserves to know hidden truths? What is the purpose of sharing the heartbreaking, stomach-churning parts of our intimate realities? Do we do it for show? Are we looking for accolades? Is there some inner restless diva bursting to get out?

No, to the last three. Who deserves to know? Probably very few people reading this. Why am I posting today? What is my purpose? Truth. Transparency. And maybe to be a voice for somebody who hasn’t seen their own story in the light of Love.

I didn’t write out most of what follows today. These words are several months old and the thoughts months older than that. I’ve shared this with a few trusted friends and have been encouraged to share in a more public way.

I learned I was abused more than a year after my husband died. I knew what had happened, of course. I wasn’t suffering from memory loss or stupidity. I simply didn’t have the language to categorize his insistence that I was manipulating him as projection, that I was making a big deal out of nothing as minimization, or that his angry outbursts were caused by the actions of the children and me as gaslighting.

I knew our relationship wasn’t all I’d hoped, and I understood I didn’t always feel comfortable with his behavior, but I managed to excuse it, because he’d been abused as a child, because he’d grown up with significant shame, because he’d battled depression throughout his life. The empathy I felt for him blinded me to the standards of accountability that should have been in place. Good boundaries were minimal or absent for most of our relationship.

As a victim of abuse, I carry my own shame. Why, as a smart woman, could I not see what is so obvious to me now? How did I recognize the discomfort, the sense of feeling something was wrong, yet not be able to pinpoint its cause? My higher education focused on the liberal arts with an emphasis on social science. I was trained to see patterns, yet I disregarded this one completely.

I loved my husband. I didn’t want him to be abusive. I waged an internal war, pitting what I could see and sense with what I so wished to be true. I denied my gut feelings urging me not to trust this person, and allowed myself to believe him when he told me full-blown lies and half-truths (which are also lies).

Participating in my victimization doesn’t paint me in a very flattering light, I don’t think. The fact that I didn’t recognize what I was doing at the time seems little more than an excuse. As an American girl raised in the 1980s, I saw my share of made-for-TV movies about battered women. I always wondered why on earth they allowed themselves to be treated that way. While Adam never physically abused me, I have begun to understand a little more.

I didn’t enter marriage expecting to be abused. I got married because I was in love, I cared about this person and I wanted to spend the rest of my life making him happy. That, right there, was the first problem. I can’t make anyone happy.

That’s not a disparaging remark about myself, but a simple statement of fact. No one can make anyone else feel any particular way. We are each responsible for our own emotions. That is part of the healthy boundaries I never learned growing up.

Both in my family and at church, I was taught to consider others more important than myself. There is even a Bible verse telling me exactly that.

Do nothing from selfishness or empty conceit, but with humility consider one another as more important than yourselves

Philippians 2:3 (NASB)


That does not say, you might notice, not to care for ourselves. It doesn’t suggest that adequate self-care is actual selfishness. In fact, the sentence continues into the next verse.

Do nothing from selfishness or empty conceit, but with humility consider one another as more important than yourselves; do not merely look out for your own personal interests, but also for the interests of others.

Philippians 2:3-4 (NASB)


I didn’t notice. That words “merely” and “also” escaped me entirely. I read on to the part where the exhortation is to be like Jesus, who “emptied himself” (v 7) in order to serve others. I believed my role was to ignore myself completely as I worked for the best of those I loved, and, as it happens, those I didn’t even like, as Jesus also instructed his followers to love our enemies (Matthew 5:44).

While I still bear responsibility for all the choices I make, I was not provided a healthy paradigm from which to make good decisions. At the outset of our marriage, I believed Bible passages calling for the husband’s leadership and the wife’s submission meant that when we came to a point of conflict we couldn’t resolve, I had to give in to Adam’s point of view, simply by virtue of his being a man and my being a woman. I thought he was meant to love me, “as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself up for her” (Ephesians 5:25, NASB), but even if he didn’t I was still supposed to sacrifice myself for him, even as Christ sacrificed himself for me, that he might have been “won over without a word by the behavior of [his wife]” (1 Peter 3:1, NASB).

The fact that I was a very bad complementarian wife, that I could never bring myself into a full state of subjugation under what I believed to be the God-ordained authority of my husband, simply reinforced my own sense of shame and my own willingness to accept Adam’s blame for our marital disharmony as biblical, holy, and right. It was not.

One of the classic findings among victims of domestic abuse is difficulty recognizing our abuse is real. Or harmful. Or not, at least partly, our own fault. These are the lies we are fed by our abusers, and sometimes our communities that—purposefully or unwittingly—reinforce the abuse.

Adam never hit me, so it wasn’t abuse, right? (Wrong.)

Adam wasn’t always seeking to be the center of attention, so he couldn’t have been a narcissist, could he? (He could.)

He didn’t know . . . except he did. He’d misunderstood . . . only he hadn’t. He didn’t mean . . . but he made the choice.

Photo by zuwiu from FreeImages

I claimed all the excuses, because I didn’t want to be married to an abusive man. I didn’t want to be an abused wife. I didn’t want to accept the truth, so I stretched and compressed and contorted myself until I could make believe there was some sort of sense in what was happening. And coming from a Christian tradition where great attention was paid to being all sinful and falling short of God’s glory (Romans 3:23), I’d learned I was not worthy of love. I understood my own failures to be a good wife to my husband, a good mother to my children, a good woman who emptied herself for others (and was fulfilled by these roles, rather than feeling resentful of everyone and everything demanding I give even more when I already was operating at a deficit) were the root cause of my unhappiness.

I couldn’t blame my husband, I felt, for what I’d brought down on myself. After all, what did Adam demand more than anything else but personal responsibility? He told me, he told the kids, we needed to take responsibility for our own actions, our own attitudes. We couldn’t blame anyone else for our behaviors or our choices. Yet we were to do as he said, not as he did, for he regularly insisted he only shouted because someone wasn’t listening or his anger was caused by someone’s disobedience or disrespect. He hid. He lied. He denied. And he claimed someone else was at fault.

I want to talk about how I’ve found such healing and am in a new healthy relationship and I can see all the good that has come from the pain, but I can’t. I’m not there yet. I am still in the trenches battling through this with myself. I am still revisiting old memories only to discover new examples of how truly damaging our relationship was, how utterly unhealthy Adam had been, long before he was diagnosed with the tumor that brought an end to his life. I am caught by my own compassion for a man I loved for more than half my adult life. The man I told, at the end of his life, he was worth loving forever. I haven’t been able to reconcile my own feelings yet. I am carried by waves of emotion from seething anger to gracious compassion to fear that I am damaged beyond repair. I understand I have to choose faith and trust and love, even when I don’t think I can.

Yet, even as I flounder in this fretful sea, the One whom even the wind and the waves obey holds me close and lets me know, over and over and over again, how very much I am loved.

I have a bit of an epilogue to add here. I said I hadn’t found healing and wasn’t in a new and healthy relationship. I worried that I wouldn’t be able to trust myself, that I’d simply fall into old patterns and choose another man who would treat me abusively. That’s no longer the case. While I am not fully healed, I am healing. And I have a new relationship that by its health is continuing to bring to light how much damage I lived with for so many years. The difference between what is now and what went before is palpable. I continue to be amazed at how much better it feels to actually be loved, rather than simply told I am.